[Answered]: The assigned two articles: Pittas AG et al

The assigned two articles: Pittas AG et al. Vitamin D supplementation and prevention of type 2 diabetes. New Engl J Med. 2019. Clarke J et al. A web-based cognitive behavior therapy intervention to improve social and occupational functioning in adults with type 2 diabetes (The SpringboardD trial): randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2019. Right Analysis. Do you think the main data analysis was appropriate in ensuring reliable and credible results? Why or why not? Do you think the study’s findings have relevance for clinical or public health practice and policy in this area? Why or why not. Consider things like: Intention-to-treat analysis as the main analysis. Interpretation of pre-specified subgroup analysis. Major strengths and limitations. What new information did this study produce? How important do you think this new information is in terms of its impact on clinical or public health practice and policy in this topic area?